Tag Archives: International

SOIL: why we need to stop treating it like DIRT

by Kate Patterson

Spring is here. Gardens are being planted, everywhere plants are flowering and the world is once again becoming green, so I thought it would be a fitting time to share some of my favorite things about one of the most dynamic, yet underappreciated systems on Earth, soil.  First, it’s important to have a bit of a background on how and why soils formed and what that has meant to the evolution of modern human civilization.  I’ll then describe some of the not-so good (and the good) news about what we have been doing to our soils in the recent past that is jeopardizing our ability to feed our growing world population and what many amazing soil scientists, farmers, gardeners, and involved citizens are doing about it.

Soil is a complex living, breathing system.  It’s packed with tons of cool organisms and is an extremely complex mixture of inorganic and organic processes, without which life on Earth could not exist.  Through industrial agricultural practices, urbanization and deforestation we are in danger of degrading our healthy soils by stripping off nutrient rich layers that are necessary for functioning ecosystems, and from a more anthropocentric perspective, for our ability to grow food.

To get a sense of just how important soil is we have to backtrack to the to the beginning of the first life on Earth, about 3.8 billion years ago, when the Earth’s average temperature was too hot and anoxic for anything except extreme cyanobacteria to survive.  The presence of bacteria on rock surfaces helped to enhance weathering rates through chemical reactions, which sped up the breakdown of rocks and formation of soils.  Carbon dioxide, an important greenhouse gas, diffused into soils to be used for various reactions, which helped to decrease its warming effect in our atmosphere.  The slow breakdown of rocks and formation of soil minerals also created a suitable nutrient rich substrate necessary for the evolution of land plants.  Through photosynthesis, plants further decreased carbon dioxide and increased oxygen levels in the atmosphere and then died and contributed organic matter to the soil.  It wasn’t until about 400 million years ago that the first land plants appeared, and only a little while before that when soils came to be as we know them today.

Fast forward to about ten thousand years ago, when humans first began transitioning to more stationary, agricultural civilizations.  Without any knowledge of genetics, we bred and domesticated plants to achieve higher yields.  It was no longer necessary for everyone to grow food.  People began to establish urban centers where new professions emerged and food was obtained from surpluses produced by a small subset of the population.  Farmers have always understood that maintaining fertile soils is imperative to successful agricultural practices.  But the advent of the Green Revolution in the 20th century led us astray, convincing us that science and technology were capable of going beyond the limits of traditional farming techniques.

The Haber-Bosch process, discovered in the early 20th century, led to the production of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers and drastically increased crop yields worldwide.  That, along with the introduction of other technologies and the use of higher yielding crops led to the establishment of larger, industrialized agricultural systems.  Our reliance on synthetic fertilizers to increase crop yields has so far allowed us to overlook the exquisitely complex systems in which plants grow best.  Sure, for now we can give them lots of nitrogen and phosphorus and they will grow.  But, without adding other forms of organic matter or manure to supply plants with nutrients and to feed bacteria, fungi and other organisms in the soil that provide essential ecosystem services, we are running a thin line between high yields and an inability to sustain the level of production that we have become accustomed to.

It seems like somehow in our urbanized, fast paced lives we have lost touch with nature and our ability to connect with the very thing that is essential for our survival and ability to feed our growing population.  In a great documentary called DIRT, there was a scene describing an urban school that wanted to convert concrete playgrounds to vegetable gardens, but a journalist reporting on the story was worried that there would be nowhere for the children to play.  I will never forget that twisted feeling I got as I realized just how disillusioned and frightened of the unpredictability of nature we have become.  We often fail to understand how important a resource soil is, and desire to escape rather than embrace and appreciate the presence of soil in our daily lives.

I happen to live in a pretty rare suburban landscape.  I have a natural greenbelt next to the river that runs through my neighborhood.  As a kid, I remember being outside and playing in soil all the time.  But it’s easy to imagine how living in urban landscapes allows many people to disconnect with nature, including more importantly I think, understanding where our food comes from.  The emergence in popularity of farmers markets and community gardens are an indication that more people are making healthy and sustainable food a priority.

Now we must go one step further and make the connection to the bigger picture and understand that soils on a global scale are in danger.  In some places, we are currently disposing of fertile soil to develop big suburban communities, complete with Wal-Marts, fast food chains and vast expanses of paved area that encourage us to forget how and why we got here in the first place.  Soil erosion is a big problem in places where deforestation to make room for agricultural landscapes has destabilized and exposed soil to the elements so that it simply washes away.  Monoculture farms that use large amounts of synthetic fertilizers to maintain high yearly yields contribute to the degradation of nutrients and biotic life in soils.  Without maintaining bacterial and fungal communities that help plant roots to obtain essential nutrients, the food that we eat is not as nutritious.

It took billions of years to establish the delicate blanket of soil covering our planet that has provided us with the ability to develop complex agrarian civilizations.  Yet, in a matter of a few generations we are well on our way to destroying one resource that we really can’t live without.  It is encouraging to see that an awareness and desire for nutritious, organic food is growing in many urban areas.  Permaculture, which designs agricultural systems to maximize efficient nutrient cycling and to maintain healthy ecosystems, is a philosophy for land management that is growing in popularity, particularly among young people looking to try farming or just urban gardening.  However, it isn’t easy.  Gardening takes lots of patience and practice and I’ve failed at it more times than I have succeeded.  Even if you don’t have the room or desire to grow some of your own food, it is possible for everyone to contribute by attending farmers markets and supporting small-scale, local farms, that through grass-roots actions, are going to revolutionize the way we appreciate and value our food, soils and our place on Earth.

Now that spring is here, farmers markets will be starting up soon.  Here’s a link to find farmers markets throughout BC.

http://www.bcfarmersmarket.org

A great website with tons of info and links to other great farming blogs as well:

http://youngagrarians.org

http://www.permaculture.org/nm/index.php/site/index/

You can watch DIRT the movie free online here

http://www.truththeory.org/dirt-the-movie/

A good quick overview on the Green Revolution:

http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/pubs/pubs/ib/ib11.pdf

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

If You Can’t Enjoy Quinoa, You’re Dead To Me.

by Melanie Hadida

Rant first; recipe later.

I guess I’ll start by addressing the recent controversy associated with quinoa farming and the ways rich white people’s demand for copious amounts of quinoa has driven up local costs of quinoa for South Americans:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/16/vegans-stomach-unpalatable-truth-quinoa

The article was making the rounds on Facebook, and I’m pretty sure if your Facebook news feed is as socially and globally conscious as mine is, you’ve already seen this article. As a proud McGill University International Development Studies alum, I am certainly aware of the plight of third world farmers and their disadvantages in the global market, unfair economic policies and the overall exploitation millions of people experience to harvest and produce the foods us greedy fatties love to stuff in our faces. I’m an extremely strong advocate of Fair Trade practices (although the movement itself has its own downfalls). Indeed, quinoa can be farmed in North America so why not support that as well!

But my problem is with trendiness. Caring about quinoa farmers has become just as trendy as quinoa itself. I have a serious issue with thousands of hipsters tweeting and Facebooking “Sorry vegans! Looks like your love of quinoa is evil for poor Bolivians!” from their laptops and smartphones that were also—surprise surprise—BUILT ON THE EXPLOITATION AND OUTRIGHT TORTURE OF OTHER PEOPLE!

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Riding on the Backs of Women: Big Words and Big Realities for the Snowboard Industry

by Chelsey Geralda Denise Armstrong

I recently attended a Masters defense entitled (deep breath) “An Analysis of White-Supremacist-Capitalist-Heteronormative-Patriarchy in the Graphics of Burton and Capita Snowboards” (by Kascindra Shewan) and while I found some holes in the authors arguments there is no question that the emerging discourse was vigorous and vivacious.

Some of you readers may indeed play a big part in the snowboard industry, many of whom are my dearest friends and colleagues. It is therefore imperative that you understand: Any investigation into the role of women in contemporary society should not be immediately deemed as femi-nazi bullshit. Rather, try to appreciate that ‘everything happens for a reason’ – the words in our language, the symbols, the conventions, the attitudes – all these exist because of the relations (past and present) between genders, classes, ethnicities and religions. For example, the term “Paddywagon”, although seeming relatively harmless, is actually deeply imbedded in the ethnic violence incurred against Irish people at the turn of the century. “That sucks” is an example of hetero-normative language, as it implies that being gay and ‘sucking dick’ is somehow unnatural and gross. I’m not arguing for the eradication of “you suck” in our everyday language (well, maybe)– I’m suggesting that while I explore the quiet violence of stereotypes against women in the snowboard industry, you should not feel offended, hopefully it should spring some healthy reflection and discourse.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Case of the Cuban Five

by the International Committee for the Freedom of the Cuban Five

A LEGAL UPDATE: THE CASE OF THE CUBAN FIVE

In September 1998, five Cuban men were arrested in Miami by FBI agents. Gerardo Hernandez, Ramón Labañino, Fernando Gonzalez, Antonio Guerrero and René Gonzalez were accused of the crime of conspiracy to commit espionage. The US government never accused them of actual espionage, nor did it affirm that real acts of espionage had been carried out, as no classified document had been confiscated from the Five. Their actual mission in the United States was monitoring the activities of the groups and organizations responsible for terrorist activities against Cuba. After the triumph of the Cuban revolution in 1959, Cuba had been the victim of more terrorist attacks than any other country in the world, killing 3,478 and injuring 2,099. The vastly majority of those attacks originated in southern Florida, by groups tolerated and partly financed by the US government.

After their arrest, the Five were immediately placed in solitary confinement, isolated from all other inmates for the entire 17 months of pretrial custody. For the first five months they were housed in separate cells isolated from each other as well as the other inmates. After those five months, a motion was filed by the defense asserting that their need to work on their defense was being compromised by the isolation. Four were then moved into the same single cell, with one kept housed alone, but they remained in the Special Housing Unit in isolation cells for all 17 months before their case was first brought before a court.

In spite of the vigorous objections raised by the Five’s defense, the case was tried in Miami, Florida, a community with a long history of hostility toward the Cuban government, which prevented them from receiving a fair trial.

Cuban 5

The trial, which lasted over six months, became the longest trial in United States history. More than 119 volumes of testimony and over 20,000 pages of documents were compiled, including the testimony of three retired US Army generals and a retired admiral, who agreed that no evidence of espionage existed.

Near the trial’s conclusion, when the case was about to be handed to the jury for consideration, the US government recognized in writing that it had failed to prove the main charge against Gerardo Hernandez, conspiracy to commit murder, admitting that it was facing an “insurmountable obstacle” in connection with winning the case. This charge had been added seven months after Gerardo’s arrest. However, the jury, under intense pressure brought to bear on them by the local media and Cuban-American community, nonetheless found the Five guilty of all charges.

The Five were sentenced to a total of four life sentences plus 77 years and were imprisoned in five separate maximum security prisons spread across the US without the possibility of communication with each other.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

GAZA: How did we get to this point, anyway?

by A concerned citizen of the world,

There is no shortage of strong opinion on the situation in Israel/Palestine right now. We seem trapped between the rock of Israel’s collective punishment and the hard place of Palestinian rocket attacks. Any debate on the issue turns into a bunch of finger pointing and tiresome ‘whataboutery’. I think if we are going to construct a useful narrative about the state of the conflict, we need to take a step back from the current tit-for-tat escalations and look at how the situation has ended up as it is. The state of affairs today was actually set in motion years ago.

To understand the current context is to acknowledge that Israel has knowingly constructed the contours of the situation to eliminate the possibility of a viable peace process. They have intentionally realigned the narrative to underscore the idea that the conflict with the Palestinians is a zero-sum game, and that Israel is under attack from extremists who cannot be negotiated with.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,

What Matters Most

by Jesse Nelson

I recently received an early Christmas present, a book titled Something Fierce by Carmen Aguirre. The book is set in South America in the 1980’s and is about a Chilean-Canadian teenager who spends a decade traveling across and living within countries such as Bolivia, Argentina and Chile with her sister and exiled revolutionary mother and step-father.

The story describes the author’s life, Carmen, as part of the underground anti-Pinochet resistance movement, eloquently detailing the economic, political and social environment in South America at the time, including the prevailing and systemic divide between classes and ethnic groups (wealthy Spanish and the impoverished aboriginals – or “indians” as referred to in the book).

It is a fascinating story about growing up as a revolutionary in politically and economically turbulent times, although the descriptions of the people and their lives, both their unrelenting selflessness and commitment to serving the greater good, as well as their bravery in the face of such extreme violence, is what sets this book apart. Absolute poverty is an underlying theme that is brought to the forefront through the author’s narratives and observations. At one point, when Carmen’s train stops at a station, she watches a family loading their luggage on the back of a ‘mule’, literally a human mule, whose jobs it is to carry the bags, luggage and other heavy items of wealthy Bolivians. She describes the mule bending over, grunting as the weight of the luggage is piled high onto their backs, knowing that the mule will likely have to walk several kilometers to the owner’s home or lodging (to no surprise, their average length of life was 35 years).

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Power to the Online People!

by Sarah Wenger

Where were you when news of the tsunami hit Japan in 2011? How about when Michael Jackson died? Probably online, according to many experts who claim that social media has become the main media source for hundreds of millions of people. Not just in the U.S., either; Facebook alone has more than 900 million users spread across the globe as of 2012. Other social media giants like Twitter have facilitated revolution against unjust leaders and warned people of impending natural disaster. In fact, so many people regularly interact online that if the Internet were a nation, it would exceed the Americas, Europe and the Middle East combined in population. No wonder more than 13 million members of the online community used Reddit and other media platforms to protest SOPA, a proposed Internet censorship bill. Keep this graphic in mind next time you log on, because knowledge is power — and a little knowledge goes a long way in the Internet Age. Check out: www.open-site.org!

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Holding Shell Accountable: The Catch of ‘Corporate Personhood’

By Tracy Giesz-Ramsay

The question of whether or not multinational corporations should enjoy the same rights as individual citizens has been much in the arena of public debate lately, the focus primarily being on if they should be granted the ability to directly fund political campaigns in the same way that individuals can. Predominant public opinion is opposed to this, but according to the U.S. Supreme Court, in the eyes of the law corporations are free to do so. In 2010, the Citizens United case ruling determined that under the First Amendment, corporations had the same rights as citizens, freeing them to pay for political advertising. This certainly means that corporations can shine the spotlight on politicians who are willing to cater to their interests.

Regardless of how unfair this may seem to so many, ‘corporate personhood’ is, after all, now the law. So considering this, if corporations have been given the ability under law to enjoy the same rights as individuals, then shouldn’t they also share the same responsibilities and face the same punishments as individuals? If a corporation funded a foreign government that tortured, oppressed or even murdered their own citizens, therefore aiding and abetting in these crimes, shouldn’t they be able to be held accountable in U.S. courts for complicity? Well it’s a valid point and is what we’re seeing right now being brought to the Supreme Court in the case of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,

The Rationale Behind the Invasion of Afghanistan is Not Control of Oil and Gas

By Jahanzeb Hussain

The invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 is perhaps the only American military venture whose cause and purpose is the most misunderstood. Why did the US attack Afghanistan? Is it because of Central Asian energy resources that the US wants to control? Did the US want to install itself right in the heart of Central Asia in order to dictate whatever economic and political development that can potentially take place in that region? After all, that region has the world’s last proven source of conventional gas and oil reserves – it is a powerhouse whose potential has yet to be properly exploited. It is also a region over which Russia, Iran, Turkey, China and India vie for influence. The only country missing in this Great Game is the United States, which, as an empire, cannot allow an important region such as Central Asia to be run by other countries, whether they are rivals or not. Following this logic, many conclude that Afghanistan was invaded to this end – for America to posit itself in a country which is the center of that region’s development (Afghanistan connects South Asia, Central Asia, Russia, China, Iran and Turkey together), as well as to surround Iran even further, and to install military bases on the Western/Southern front of China. In general, the invasion of Afghanistan was seen as a natural extension of America’s desire to militarize its energy politics in Muslim countries. The invasion of Iraq two years later was another proof of this policy. Afghanistan had all the credentials to qualify as yet another country that was targeted by the US for its geostrategic and economic importance.  Many would argue that attacks on the World Trade Center were welcomed by the United States as they helped provide a pretext for Washington to occupy Afghanistan and to continue its quest for global dominance.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , ,

Shady Sponsorship and Bhopal’s Special Olympics

by Melanie Hadida

Photo Credit: Sanjay Verma

About a week ago I found myself in Cardiff, Wales searching for a place to have a tea and scam some free internet so I could do some work. The best option to meet those specifications (in the city centre of a big UK city) is always Starbucks. It was a rare beautiful and sunny day and I was desperate to get as much time outdoors as possible. When I went up to the counter to order my chai, I asked the barista why their neatly stacked patio furniture had not been placed outside yet. “We’re not allowed,” she told me, “this is the Olympic Park area and no one is allowed to set up outdoors—we could be fined £20,000.” (On account of not giving a crap about the Olympics, I had no idea that Cardiff is apparently one of the event locations.)

Turns out, that since Starbucks isn’t an official sponsor of the 2012 London Olympic games, they could not set up tables and chairs on the lovely sunny cobblestone walkway outside of the café because this would be un-sanctioned advertisement for Starbucks. And this would make Coca Cola and McDonalds angry….and you wouldn’t like them when they’re angry…

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers

%d bloggers like this: