Tag Archives: Feminism

Happy International Women’s Day! Less talk, more action to end violence against women

by Sarah Allan

Happy International Women’s Day!

I wish that this day could be spent celebrating the successes and achievements of women around the world, but sadly, though its 2013 and we have come a long way, locally and globally the focus is still on the very real and seemingly ever-present issue of violence against women. While it is variously referred to as ‘domestic violence’ (by the B.C. government), ‘family violence’ (by B.C.’s Family Law Act), ‘violence against women in relationships’ (also by the B.C. government) , and other other vague names, it all boils down to, and should accurately be called, violence against women. When talking about an issue as important as this, it’s important to choose our words carefully and with intention, as the language we use to frame a discussion sets parameters for coming up with solutions, whether we mean it to or not. I among others take issue with the misleading labels commonly used to describe physical, sexual, emotional and psychological violence towards women, as ‘domestic violence’ infers privacy and violence that takes place in the home; as ‘family violence’ and ‘domestic violence’ both obscure the gendered nature of what it is most often describing, violence by a man against a women; and as ‘violence against women in relationships’ glosses over the fact that women’s risk of violence increases once a relationship is over. Call it what you will, but i doesn’t erase the reality of violence against women in this country. It is still true that more than half of all Canadian women have experienced at least one incident of physical or sexual violence since the age of 16 and that women are more likely to be assaulted by someone that they know, than by a stranger.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Riding on the Backs of Women: Big Words and Big Realities for the Snowboard Industry

by Chelsey Geralda Denise Armstrong

I recently attended a Masters defense entitled (deep breath) “An Analysis of White-Supremacist-Capitalist-Heteronormative-Patriarchy in the Graphics of Burton and Capita Snowboards” (by Kascindra Shewan) and while I found some holes in the authors arguments there is no question that the emerging discourse was vigorous and vivacious.

Some of you readers may indeed play a big part in the snowboard industry, many of whom are my dearest friends and colleagues. It is therefore imperative that you understand: Any investigation into the role of women in contemporary society should not be immediately deemed as femi-nazi bullshit. Rather, try to appreciate that ‘everything happens for a reason’ – the words in our language, the symbols, the conventions, the attitudes – all these exist because of the relations (past and present) between genders, classes, ethnicities and religions. For example, the term “Paddywagon”, although seeming relatively harmless, is actually deeply imbedded in the ethnic violence incurred against Irish people at the turn of the century. “That sucks” is an example of hetero-normative language, as it implies that being gay and ‘sucking dick’ is somehow unnatural and gross. I’m not arguing for the eradication of “you suck” in our everyday language (well, maybe)– I’m suggesting that while I explore the quiet violence of stereotypes against women in the snowboard industry, you should not feel offended, hopefully it should spring some healthy reflection and discourse.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ode to the Lady Blogger

by Matea Kulić

I admit it. I used to be a blog snob. I doubted the worth of virtual prose preferring to sniff the discolored pages of Great Literature.

Recently, the book Heroines knocked me over the head, waking me from a deep sleep. In it, author Kate Zambreno, reclaims the traditionally pathologized biographies of Vivienne Eliot, Jane Bowles, Jean Rhys, and Zelda Fitzgerald, while threading throughout her own experiences of marginalization as a writer. The idea for the book was incubated through her blog.

Zambreno contrasts the controlled expression of the wives of the modernist authors, to aspiring (female) authors today. Because it is “never edited by an alien hand and totally under the control of the writer, the blog post refuses to be anything but what it wants to be” says Zambreno.

While critics have historically trivialized the subject matter or unedited style of the notebook-diary, for Zambreno what counts is that women, often excluded from the ranks of literature that mattered, are now telling their stories through Tumblrs, LiveJournals and blogs.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Men and Feminism

by Emma Bonnemaison

Can men be feminists? Should men participate in the struggle to end sexism and sexual exploitation? How can men fit into the feminist women’s movement without co-opting it or replicating male dominance? Controversial, and often avoided, these questions are beginning to be asked more frequently by young profeminist men and feminists alike. Many profeminist men and feminist scholars have explained that feminism isn’t just for women, systems of patriarchy and gender expectations limit all of us just as gender equality benefits both men and women. Patriarchal thinking shapes core values and ways of being within our society. We are socialized into this system and under it both men and women suffer the consequences. This is not to say that men are not responsible for their actions or that they don’t benefit from patriarchy, however, many feminists argue that men who actively oppose systems of patriarchy have an integral part to play within the feminist movement. Others argue, because females are the oppressed group only women can empower other women. hooks defines feminism as a “movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation and oppression.”[1] Without absolving individual men of the responsibility to critically examine their privilege and take responsibility for their actions, defining feminism as an anti-sexist movement allows everybody to participate within feminist endeavors. Further, isn’t it time that men take responsibility to end their collusion with patriarchal oppression?

This article seeks to answer three questions contributed by Keir, a male colleague and close friend, who is interested in learning more about feminism and becoming a part of the movement. His direct participation and voice within this article contribute both literally and symbolically to a pro-feminist dialogue in hopes that creating these linkages between men and feminism will help to strengthen men’s understanding and connection to the movement.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How Teaching Got Its Skirt (And Why That Skirt is Knee-Length)

by Shmoo Ritchie

            The feminization of teaching in 19th century Canada was due to a variety of factors, most notably the growing demand for teachers created by increases in enrollment. Because, at the time, men had a greater range of employment opportunities open to them compared to women—in accordance with Victorian principles—they were frequently drawn away from education as a job, leaving a vacuum in the profession that needed filling. By drawing on Victorian ideals of women-as-mothers, and comparing teaching to motherhood, female teacher sympathizers argued in favour of women-as-teachers, successfully defending women’s employment outside of the house. Furthermore, since women’s work was undervalued in society and female teachers were seen as less prestigious, less competent, and less authoritative compared to male teachers, they commanded a significantly lower salary. Thus the feminization of teaching was justified along economic means as well as ideological ones.

            If historically women began dominating the education sphere along pragmatic (economic and supply/demand) and ideological (teaching is mothering) lines, how have things changed in the wake of the feminist and women’s movements of the 20th century? Now that women are purportedly equal to men, and theoretically have access to the same employment opportunities as men do, why is the teaching profession still dominated by women? The answer, we will see, is that things have changed less than we might imagine.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

The Blind Friend-Date: Growing the Female Network for World Domination

by Sarah Allan and Jessica Linnay

Whether you call them your girlfriends, your sisters from other misters, or yo’ bitches, your female friends are your supporters, your back up, your partners in adventure, your inspiration and your soft place to fall (all while looking fabulous, mmhmm). They tell you the truth and they want the best for you. So why is it so hard to make new girlfriends?

It seems that every magazine targeting young women contains advice, strategies and insight into how to meet guys and catch yourself a boyfriend, when many young women struggle with a very different problem, how to meet and keep quality female friends.

You know they say that to raise a child it takes a village. It is statistically proven that girls with multiple positive female role models around them during their development have higher self-esteem, ambition, and are less likely to fall prey to the outrageous standards that society and the media thrust upon the “fairer sex.”

Having strong female ties also protects you from stress. (to an extent!)

“Women are much more social in the way they cope with stress,” says Shelley E. Taylor, author of “The Tending Instinct” (Owl Books) and a social neuroscientist at UCLA. “Men are more likely to deal with stress with a ‘fight or flight’ reaction–with aggression or withdrawal.” But aggression and withdrawal take a physiological toll, and friendship brings comfort that mitigates the ill effects of stress, Taylor says. That difference alone, she adds, “contributes to the gender difference in longevity.”

In fact, for women, there is some evidence that a male partner, in times of stress, can make things worse. In a study published in the journal Psychosomatic Medicine in 1995, German researchers found that when subjects were given a stressful task–in this case, preparing a speech for delivery in front of an audience–men who were joined by their female partner for the preparation period showed much lower stress levels than those who had no support. When women preparing their speeches were joined by their male partners, their stress hormones surged.

While I’m not saying that meeting guys is a piece of cake, I think most of us are pretty clear on the ‘how to’s’ and ‘where to’s’ of dating. You can approach a guy in a bar and strike up a conversation, even give out your number, without causing so much as a raised eyebrow, but try and ‘pick up’ a potential female friend at a bar? Give your number to a girl you don’t know who you thought had nice boots and was good at pool? Unheard of! First, they may get the wrong idea and think you are trying to pick them up in a romantic fashion. Second, they may think you are a weirdo with no friends of your own, desperately seeking some companionship (which you probably are, minus the weirdo part.)

The truth is in this day and age, young women move, travel and relocate like never before. Many of us move to other cities, or even countries, for a job, with a partner, to go to school, or just to get the *&#@ out of wherever we lived before. Many adventurous young women have no trouble meeting guys in these new locales, but struggle to meet quality women-friends. It might be slightly easier to meet some party girls to go for a drink with, or the girlfriends of friends of your guy, but solid, awesome, smart, intelligent, down to adventure, females that want to bro-down, debate the issues, share a meal, bitch about work, shop for shoes, go to yoga, or lay at the beach with? Nearly impossible!

Think about the last time you saw an intriguing female on the bus or at a coffee shop. The thought of approaching someone for friendship is somehow more intimidating for most than striking up a romantic (or sexual) conversation. We’re never going to make much progress with such a fragmented female society, prioritizing male companionship instead of support networks and inspiring relationships.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Simone de Beauvoir Institute’s Take on Feminism and the Bedford Decision

Simone de Beauvoir Institute at Concordia University, via Sarah Allan

The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently ruled that two elements of Canada’s prostitution laws cause harm to women (Canada Attorney General v. Bedford, 2012 ONCA 186: http://www.ontariocourts.ca/decisions_index/new_releases.htm). Specifically, the Court argues that the bawdy house provisions and the living off the avails provisions of the Criminal Code violate the security of individuals who work in the sex trade and, as such, are unconstitutional. In more simple terms, the court argues that prostitution laws put women in the sex trade at risk of violence and that these laws violate the fundamental Charter rights of sex workers.

What the Ruling Means
The ruling removes barriers for women working in the sex trade that increase their vulnerability to violence and harm. It allows them to hire a driver or a bodyguard, for example, as a way to ensure their safety-practices that were previously criminalized (living off the avails provision). It enables women to work together out of the same apartment; this practice was criminalized under the bawdy house laws. The ruling means that women can work more safely and that they can work together.

Why We Support the Ruling as Feminists
The ruling begins with the explicit statement that the question at hand is not about morality, but is rather one of constitutionality (paragraph 9). As feminists, we support a legal framework in which complex social issues are disentangled from patriarchal moral norms. Historically, the idea that women should not wear pants in church, the implicit condemnation of women who chose to have a child outside of marriage, or the notion that women who dress sexy in some way invite sexual assault and rape are different examples of the ways the patriarchal moral order has framed how women’s actions, behaviours and dress have been considered, in society at large and in the legal arena. Full equality before the law for women is facilitated when ”morality” is excluded from legal considerations.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Black History Month: What’s Vancouver’s Story?

by Sekyiwa Wi-Afedzi

About a month and a half ago, I was working as a Production Assistant on a friend’s independent film.  Everyone on set, other than the crew, was well over 60 years old.  One of my tasks for the day had me picking up and dropping off some of the actors scheduled to be on set.  As chance would have it, mid-afternoon, the last actor on my pick-up list was a distinguished older black gentleman named Richard.  As a black woman who rarely has the opportunity to interact with other black people in the city (Vancouver has a black community that is relatively small compared to other large Canadian cities), I instigated a conversation with him that led to our chatting about what Vancouver was like in the 60’s versus what the city has now become.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,

“Ok not gonna lie I’d let Chris Brown Beat the eff out of me”

by Melanie Hadida

I hate Rihanna. So much. Just ask any of my friends. If you’re ever out with me and we’re unlucky enough to have some background Rihanna music infiltrate our ears, I can guarantee you will have to sit through one of my anti-Rihanna rants.

Which is why I wasn’t surprised to wake up on Monday morning to see that more than one of my friends had brought this to my attention:

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/horrible-reactions-to-chris-brown-at-the-grammys

Was I shocked? Nope. Outraged? Obviously. Sad? Extremely.

As a proud feminist with an avid disdain for mainstream pop music, Rihanna was never really on my radar until this incident took place almost exactly 3 years ago:

http://gawker.com/5149353/chris-brown-arrested-for-allegedly-beating-up-rihanna

Chris Brown, another musical “artist” who I had never even thought twice about, was arrested for beating the shit out of his then girlfriend Rihanna. I believe they were either only about 20 or 21 at the time.

I have no interest in launching into a diatribe about violence against women, why it happens and how it affects women of every color, class and nationality. As we’ve seen with the recent Canadian Shafia murder trials, (highly profiled for its extreme heinousness but probably more for peoples’ fascination with the exotic and sexy term “honour killings” attached to the crimes) control and violence against women is still extremely prevalent in societies across the globe today.

In terms of Chris Brown’s ability to maintain popularity following his admission of brutality towards his then girlfriend, I was definitely not surprised. I mean, countless men strangely considered to be “role models” for youth (politicians, athletes, musicians etc.) behave in ways considered reprehensible by many yet their popularity (and their cash flow) never wanes.

So why is this incident so different?

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Islamophobia in Canada: A Primer

by Fathima Cader and Sumayya Kassamali

Ten years after September 11, 2001, the term “Islamophobia,” once largely obscure, has become all but inevitable when discussing contemporary politics. As Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden became household names, Western fear of the world’s 1.5 billion Muslims has also grown. Canada has been no stranger to this phenomenon. Despite its reputation as a haven of multicultural tolerance, one 2011 poll showed that 56% of Canadians believe Western societies are in “irreconcilable conflict” with Muslim societies. 40% of the 1500 respondents approved the profiling of airplane passengers who appear Muslim.  As Canada enters its seventh year of Conservative rule, how are progressives to understand and respond to this trend?

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers

%d bloggers like this: