Tag Archives: Equality

Open Letter from Chomsky, Shiva, Pilger, Santos, and 40 more..

Monday, July 23, 2012

The following self explanatory communication is being sent to many people and institutions.
Hello,

We the signers of the open letter from Noam Chomsky, Vandana Shiva, Boaventura de sousa Santos, John Pilger, and 40 other members of the interim decision body of the new International Organization for a Participatory Society, hope that you will republish our letter, and, even more, that you will publish commentary regarding the organization’s purpose, implications, prospects, etc.

Please reply to let us know your personal reaction, and whether you will be recirculating this, or perhaps taking some other related steps.

An Open Message to All Who Seek A New and Better World
We are members of what is called the the Interim Consultative Committee of the International Organization for a Participatory Society - or IOPS for short.

IOPS is actually an interim entity, pending a future founding convention. IOPS was convened just a few months ago and already has over 2,100 members from 85 countries and a ten language site, despite that it is barely known publicly. IOPS is currently building local chapters, which will unite to form national branches that in turn will compose an international organization.

We send this open letter to invite you to please visit the IOPS Site to examine its initial features – including especially and most importantly its Mission and Visionary and Programmatic Commitments.

The IOPS commitments emerged from a long process of discussion and debate. We believe they correspond closely to the most prevalent, advanced, and widely accessible political beliefs on which to build an organization for winning a better world.

We also hope and even believe that if you read and consider the IOPS commitments, you will likely find that they are congenial to your interests and desires and that they provide reason for great hope that IOPS can become a very important organization in the coming years.

If we had to summarize the IOPS commitments, we would note that they emphasize:

  • that IOPS focuses on cultural, kinship, political, economic, international, and ecological aims without a priori prioritizing any of these over the rest;
  • that IOPS advocates and elaborates key aspects of vision for a sustainable and peaceful world without sexism, heterosexism, racism, classism, and authoritarianism and with equity, justice, solidarity, diversity, and, in particular, self-management for all people
  • and that IOPS structurally and programmatically emphasizes planting the seeds of the future in the present, winning immediate gains on behalf of suffering constituencies in ways contributing to winning its long term aims as well, developing a caring and nurturing organization and movement, and welcoming and even fostering constructive dissent and diversity within that organization and movement and based on its commitments.

We think hundreds of thousands of people, in fact, millions of people, will, on reading the commitments, overwhelmingly agree with them. We hope that if you look at the commitments and feel that way, you will join and advocate that others join as well. If you instead have problems with the IOPS commitments, we hope you will make your concerns known so a productive discussion can ensue.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How Teaching Got Its Skirt (And Why That Skirt is Knee-Length)

by Shmoo Ritchie

            The feminization of teaching in 19th century Canada was due to a variety of factors, most notably the growing demand for teachers created by increases in enrollment. Because, at the time, men had a greater range of employment opportunities open to them compared to women—in accordance with Victorian principles—they were frequently drawn away from education as a job, leaving a vacuum in the profession that needed filling. By drawing on Victorian ideals of women-as-mothers, and comparing teaching to motherhood, female teacher sympathizers argued in favour of women-as-teachers, successfully defending women’s employment outside of the house. Furthermore, since women’s work was undervalued in society and female teachers were seen as less prestigious, less competent, and less authoritative compared to male teachers, they commanded a significantly lower salary. Thus the feminization of teaching was justified along economic means as well as ideological ones.

            If historically women began dominating the education sphere along pragmatic (economic and supply/demand) and ideological (teaching is mothering) lines, how have things changed in the wake of the feminist and women’s movements of the 20th century? Now that women are purportedly equal to men, and theoretically have access to the same employment opportunities as men do, why is the teaching profession still dominated by women? The answer, we will see, is that things have changed less than we might imagine.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

The Blind Friend-Date: Growing the Female Network for World Domination

by Sarah Allan and Jessica Linnay

Whether you call them your girlfriends, your sisters from other misters, or yo’ bitches, your female friends are your supporters, your back up, your partners in adventure, your inspiration and your soft place to fall (all while looking fabulous, mmhmm). They tell you the truth and they want the best for you. So why is it so hard to make new girlfriends?

It seems that every magazine targeting young women contains advice, strategies and insight into how to meet guys and catch yourself a boyfriend, when many young women struggle with a very different problem, how to meet and keep quality female friends.

You know they say that to raise a child it takes a village. It is statistically proven that girls with multiple positive female role models around them during their development have higher self-esteem, ambition, and are less likely to fall prey to the outrageous standards that society and the media thrust upon the “fairer sex.”

Having strong female ties also protects you from stress. (to an extent!)

“Women are much more social in the way they cope with stress,” says Shelley E. Taylor, author of “The Tending Instinct” (Owl Books) and a social neuroscientist at UCLA. “Men are more likely to deal with stress with a ‘fight or flight’ reaction–with aggression or withdrawal.” But aggression and withdrawal take a physiological toll, and friendship brings comfort that mitigates the ill effects of stress, Taylor says. That difference alone, she adds, “contributes to the gender difference in longevity.”

In fact, for women, there is some evidence that a male partner, in times of stress, can make things worse. In a study published in the journal Psychosomatic Medicine in 1995, German researchers found that when subjects were given a stressful task–in this case, preparing a speech for delivery in front of an audience–men who were joined by their female partner for the preparation period showed much lower stress levels than those who had no support. When women preparing their speeches were joined by their male partners, their stress hormones surged.

While I’m not saying that meeting guys is a piece of cake, I think most of us are pretty clear on the ‘how to’s’ and ‘where to’s’ of dating. You can approach a guy in a bar and strike up a conversation, even give out your number, without causing so much as a raised eyebrow, but try and ‘pick up’ a potential female friend at a bar? Give your number to a girl you don’t know who you thought had nice boots and was good at pool? Unheard of! First, they may get the wrong idea and think you are trying to pick them up in a romantic fashion. Second, they may think you are a weirdo with no friends of your own, desperately seeking some companionship (which you probably are, minus the weirdo part.)

The truth is in this day and age, young women move, travel and relocate like never before. Many of us move to other cities, or even countries, for a job, with a partner, to go to school, or just to get the *&#@ out of wherever we lived before. Many adventurous young women have no trouble meeting guys in these new locales, but struggle to meet quality women-friends. It might be slightly easier to meet some party girls to go for a drink with, or the girlfriends of friends of your guy, but solid, awesome, smart, intelligent, down to adventure, females that want to bro-down, debate the issues, share a meal, bitch about work, shop for shoes, go to yoga, or lay at the beach with? Nearly impossible!

Think about the last time you saw an intriguing female on the bus or at a coffee shop. The thought of approaching someone for friendship is somehow more intimidating for most than striking up a romantic (or sexual) conversation. We’re never going to make much progress with such a fragmented female society, prioritizing male companionship instead of support networks and inspiring relationships.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

La Hausse La Hausse… On the 100th Day of Student Protests in Quebec

by Annie Guglia

Je m’appelle Annie Guglia, j’ai 21 ans, je suis candidate au Baccalauréat en Administration des Affaire à l’Université du Québec À Montréal, et contrairement à ce que les médias essaient de vous faire croire, je ne suis pas ni terroriste, ni extrémiste, ni anticapitaliste, et j’arrive absolument à comprendre les répercussions directes et indirectes de mes actions.

Je sais que beaucoup de canadiens hors-Québec pensent que les étudiants québécois sont idiots et agissent en bébés gâtés depuis l’annonce de la hausse de nos frais de scolarité postsecondaires. Nous payons effectivement les droits de scolarité les moins cher en Amérique du Nord, nous en sommes conscients. Cependant, toute problématique doit être placée dans son contexte afin d’être comprise, et je trouve que la plupart des médias (et surtout anglais) exposent mal le conflit étudiant que je côtoie presque quotidiennement. Laissez-moi donc vous expliquer objectivement (ou presque) en quoi consiste la hausse imposée par le gouvernement libéral de Jean Charest, et ensuite, je placerai cette hausse dans son contexte socio-politico-économique afin d’expliquer pourquoi elle est inacceptable aux yeux de beaucoup de Québécois. 

My name is Annie Guglia. I am 21 years old, and I study management at Université du Québec à Montréal. Unlike the media is trying to convey, I am not a terrorist or extremist or anticapitalist, and I fully understand the direct and indirect consequences of my actions. I know some of you “off-Quebec” support us, and I thank you! Some others think that Quebec students are currently acting like idiots or spoiled children since our government announced a drastic tuition fee hike. We acknowledge that we pay a lot less that most people in North America, but everything in life must be put in its context to be understood. Let me explain first objectively (but not really) what the increase will be, then I will put it in its socio-politico-economic context to make you understand the reasons why the increase is so unacceptable to most Quebecers at this point.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Paul Hawken on Ideology, Abolitionists, and a New Movement for our Future

by Tracy Giesz-Ramsay

Given the opportunity to hear environmentalist and author Paul Hawken speak, one would be hard pressed to leave without feeling equally hopeful and inspired about the future of humanity. Hawken is the author of “Blessed Unrest, How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming” and although a gentle speaker, his words vivaciously seize your attention and don’t let it go as he takes you on a phonetic tour through the histories of true grassroots movements, starting from the abolitionists in the 1700’s leading up to today’s smaller-scale, non-governmental organizations that are working for environmental and social justice. Hawken is the founder of wiserearth.org, a database of these NGOs that aims to present a platform of necessary issues that they collectively agree must be addressed in order to sustain and save our planet.

For Hawken, this historical journey and subsequent documentation began on his first book tour when people from non-profits kept handing him their organization’s business cards. Never getting rid of them, he found himself one day with literally thousands from all types of environmental and social justice organizations around the world. This led him to the realization that the social justice and human rights movements were really just different expressions of one movement that included the environmental movement.

He found there are currently around 2 million organizations with 100-200 million people working every single day towards preserving, and restoring some semblance of grace and justice to this world with what they do in their daily activity, affecting billions of people. As he states, it’s a massive network composed of: students, peasant workers, tribal villagers, doctors, engineers, mediators, peace makers, mothers, activists, immigrants, children, refugees, tree planters, poets, farmers, biologists, Muslims, Christians and Buddhists. It includes every culture, every tribe, and every language in the world today. And the notable thing is that this movement has no leader. We’re so accustomed to a movement or a revolution having a singular, often charismatic leader, and while there are certainly spokespeople all over the world, there is no defined leader.

What also distinguishes this movement from anything else that we’ve ever seen, is that it is not ideological. It is a movement of ideas and solutions; a movement of both trying to stop the harm and resist what’s going on by providing new ways of imagining this relationship between the two most complex systems there are, which are human culture and the earth’s living ecosystems.

Hawkens states that if you look back at the 19th century, you’ll see the birth of ideologies and isms. And then taking a look at the 20th century, you’ll see total war of these ideologies; one hundred and twenty million people died while the advocates of each ideology battled one another trying to figure out who was right.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 101 – Happy 30th Birthday!

by Sarah Allan

If you’re like me, and were born after 1982, you never knew a Canada without the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Maybe that is why so many of us never really think about the Charter and what it means, because for us, it has always been there. So, since it seems that Harper and his Conservatives are too busy selling off our natural resources and making enemies of the popultion to celebrate this important milestone in Canadian history, and to avoid taking for granted the rights and protections this prolific document provides and guarantees us as Canadians, today, on the Charter’s 30th birthday, I thought I’d give you all a run down on the Charter and it’s main provisions. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 101!

Why are you allowed to share your opinions with others as you please? The Charter! Why do you have a right to vote? The Charter! Why do you have a right to a lawyer if you’re arrested? The Charter! Why are you presumed innocent until proven guilty? The Charter! Why is the government required to treat us equally regardless of race or gender? The Charter! As you read this, I hope that you will think about how the Charter impacts your life and the lives of other Canadians, but also, I hope you will try and imagine what life would be without it, because my friends Canada would be a very different place.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Take It Away, Canada

By Rebeccah Redden

Opportunities come by all the time, especially now with media so accessible. You can get an email for a contest and the next day you have a new gift card. You can listen to the radio and win tickets to see Justin Beiber. Sometimes those opportunities go nowhere. But opportunities that are solid, that are good, that are golden, that you will always be able to catch are extremely rare.

Insert Katimavik. Katimavik is Canada’s leading youth volunteer program. It has been around since 1977, as started under Pierre Trudeau’s government by Jacques Hébert. It has changed many times throughout its long standing Canadian career until reaching todays six month program, providing a stay in two Canadian communities. Each program annually consists of around 800 youth. Each group has 11 youth age 17- 21. Each participant volunteers for about 40 hours per week and completes a learning program that focuses on Canada’s official languages, protecting the environment, leadership, cultural diversity, and leading a healthy lifestyle. Each year, more than 500 non-profit organizations are assisted by Katimavik volunteers doing full-time work.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bill C-31 and Our Refugee System: A Plea for Justice

by Gregory Johannson

For those that value the liberal democratic paradigm in Canada, be alarmed. With Bill C-31 in Parliament with a majority government, the principle of equality before the law faces erosion in ways that threaten the rights of refugees and refugee claimants, and by extension, every Canadian. Indiscriminate, mandatory detention and the deliberate removal of the right to a fair hearing for certain classes of people (among other clauses in the Bill’s current form) constitute corrosive elements on our justice system. Any measure that restricts the right of a person – whether the most vulnerable or most powerful – from receiving equitable treatment in the eyes of the law is a threat, not only to those targeted, but to our society as a whole. A slippery slope indeed.

Less a shocker than an extension of a manifestly anti-refugee political trajectory, Bill C-31 is part of a legislative climate that has witnessed more steps backward than forward since Canada became the first (and to date, only) country to receive the UNHCR Nansen Medal in 1986 for ‘outstanding services in supporting refugee causes.’ It was a proud moment, but a fleeting one. Take a minute to mull over the U.S.-Canada Safe Third Country Agreement (STC), one of the more profound regressions. STC allows the U.S. – a country with a rocky past in its outlook on torture and recognition of gender as grounds for refugeehood – to make binding decisions on refugee claimants before they ever arrive in Canada.

Would we force Canadian criminals to be tried in Florida and face the death penalty? Why design a system for our society if we lack the resolve to respect its outcomes?

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Simone de Beauvoir Institute’s Take on Feminism and the Bedford Decision

Simone de Beauvoir Institute at Concordia University, via Sarah Allan

The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently ruled that two elements of Canada’s prostitution laws cause harm to women (Canada Attorney General v. Bedford, 2012 ONCA 186: http://www.ontariocourts.ca/decisions_index/new_releases.htm). Specifically, the Court argues that the bawdy house provisions and the living off the avails provisions of the Criminal Code violate the security of individuals who work in the sex trade and, as such, are unconstitutional. In more simple terms, the court argues that prostitution laws put women in the sex trade at risk of violence and that these laws violate the fundamental Charter rights of sex workers.

What the Ruling Means
The ruling removes barriers for women working in the sex trade that increase their vulnerability to violence and harm. It allows them to hire a driver or a bodyguard, for example, as a way to ensure their safety-practices that were previously criminalized (living off the avails provision). It enables women to work together out of the same apartment; this practice was criminalized under the bawdy house laws. The ruling means that women can work more safely and that they can work together.

Why We Support the Ruling as Feminists
The ruling begins with the explicit statement that the question at hand is not about morality, but is rather one of constitutionality (paragraph 9). As feminists, we support a legal framework in which complex social issues are disentangled from patriarchal moral norms. Historically, the idea that women should not wear pants in church, the implicit condemnation of women who chose to have a child outside of marriage, or the notion that women who dress sexy in some way invite sexual assault and rape are different examples of the ways the patriarchal moral order has framed how women’s actions, behaviours and dress have been considered, in society at large and in the legal arena. Full equality before the law for women is facilitated when ”morality” is excluded from legal considerations.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Ever Been Called An “Extremist” for Hating Hate?

Last weekend, Don Davies, Immigration critic for the NDP and MP for Vancouver-Kingsway, attended an anti-racist community march and block party that No One Is Illegal-Vancouver (NOII) had organised after local neo-Nazis lit on fire and attacked several people of colour in Vancouver on Commercial Drive, a Vancouver neighbourhood otherwise infamous for its glut of organic grocery stores.

That afternoon, Davies tweeted about how much he had enjoyed the demonstration, for which he was promptly flame-warred by Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism. Yesterday, on the NDP’s new leadership’s first day in Parliament, Kenney and another Conservative MP, Devinder Shory, continued their ad hominem arguments by attacking Davies in Parliament for having been at the demonstration (including making demands that he apologise, evidently for being there at all). Reporter Karl Nerenberg provides a summary of that “debate.” The full transcript is available on Hansard.  Kenney also issued a press release on his personal website against NOII.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 74 other followers

%d bloggers like this: