Category Archives: Violence Against Women

Happy International Women’s Day! Less talk, more action to end violence against women

by Sarah Allan

Happy International Women’s Day!

I wish that this day could be spent celebrating the successes and achievements of women around the world, but sadly, though its 2013 and we have come a long way, locally and globally the focus is still on the very real and seemingly ever-present issue of violence against women. While it is variously referred to as ‘domestic violence’ (by the B.C. government), ‘family violence’ (by B.C.’s Family Law Act), ‘violence against women in relationships’ (also by the B.C. government) , and other other vague names, it all boils down to, and should accurately be called, violence against women. When talking about an issue as important as this, it’s important to choose our words carefully and with intention, as the language we use to frame a discussion sets parameters for coming up with solutions, whether we mean it to or not. I among others take issue with the misleading labels commonly used to describe physical, sexual, emotional and psychological violence towards women, as ‘domestic violence’ infers privacy and violence that takes place in the home; as ‘family violence’ and ‘domestic violence’ both obscure the gendered nature of what it is most often describing, violence by a man against a women; and as ‘violence against women in relationships’ glosses over the fact that women’s risk of violence increases once a relationship is over. Call it what you will, but i doesn’t erase the reality of violence against women in this country. It is still true that more than half of all Canadian women have experienced at least one incident of physical or sexual violence since the age of 16 and that women are more likely to be assaulted by someone that they know, than by a stranger.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Men and Feminism

by Emma Bonnemaison

Can men be feminists? Should men participate in the struggle to end sexism and sexual exploitation? How can men fit into the feminist women’s movement without co-opting it or replicating male dominance? Controversial, and often avoided, these questions are beginning to be asked more frequently by young profeminist men and feminists alike. Many profeminist men and feminist scholars have explained that feminism isn’t just for women, systems of patriarchy and gender expectations limit all of us just as gender equality benefits both men and women. Patriarchal thinking shapes core values and ways of being within our society. We are socialized into this system and under it both men and women suffer the consequences. This is not to say that men are not responsible for their actions or that they don’t benefit from patriarchy, however, many feminists argue that men who actively oppose systems of patriarchy have an integral part to play within the feminist movement. Others argue, because females are the oppressed group only women can empower other women. hooks defines feminism as a “movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation and oppression.”[1] Without absolving individual men of the responsibility to critically examine their privilege and take responsibility for their actions, defining feminism as an anti-sexist movement allows everybody to participate within feminist endeavors. Further, isn’t it time that men take responsibility to end their collusion with patriarchal oppression?

This article seeks to answer three questions contributed by Keir, a male colleague and close friend, who is interested in learning more about feminism and becoming a part of the movement. His direct participation and voice within this article contribute both literally and symbolically to a pro-feminist dialogue in hopes that creating these linkages between men and feminism will help to strengthen men’s understanding and connection to the movement.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Simone de Beauvoir Institute’s Take on Feminism and the Bedford Decision

Simone de Beauvoir Institute at Concordia University, via Sarah Allan

The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently ruled that two elements of Canada’s prostitution laws cause harm to women (Canada Attorney General v. Bedford, 2012 ONCA 186: http://www.ontariocourts.ca/decisions_index/new_releases.htm). Specifically, the Court argues that the bawdy house provisions and the living off the avails provisions of the Criminal Code violate the security of individuals who work in the sex trade and, as such, are unconstitutional. In more simple terms, the court argues that prostitution laws put women in the sex trade at risk of violence and that these laws violate the fundamental Charter rights of sex workers.

What the Ruling Means
The ruling removes barriers for women working in the sex trade that increase their vulnerability to violence and harm. It allows them to hire a driver or a bodyguard, for example, as a way to ensure their safety-practices that were previously criminalized (living off the avails provision). It enables women to work together out of the same apartment; this practice was criminalized under the bawdy house laws. The ruling means that women can work more safely and that they can work together.

Why We Support the Ruling as Feminists
The ruling begins with the explicit statement that the question at hand is not about morality, but is rather one of constitutionality (paragraph 9). As feminists, we support a legal framework in which complex social issues are disentangled from patriarchal moral norms. Historically, the idea that women should not wear pants in church, the implicit condemnation of women who chose to have a child outside of marriage, or the notion that women who dress sexy in some way invite sexual assault and rape are different examples of the ways the patriarchal moral order has framed how women’s actions, behaviours and dress have been considered, in society at large and in the legal arena. Full equality before the law for women is facilitated when ”morality” is excluded from legal considerations.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

2 out of 3 Prostitution Laws Unconstitutional: A Partial Victory for Sex Workers

by Sarah Allan

Today, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its judgment in the matter of Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, which brought a constitutional challenge to the criminal laws that relate to prostitution. They struck down two of the three laws that were challenged, on the basis that they violated sex workers rights to take steps to ensure their own safety and security, and pretty much needlessly exposed them to increased levels of violence and harm. The five justices determined:

  • the law prohibiting brothels or ‘common bawdy houses’ was disproportionate and overbroad and should be struck down;
  • the law prohibiting ‘living off the avails of prostitution’ was overbroad, and should be read down to only apply where there are “circumstances of exploitation”;
  • the law prohbiting ‘communicating for the purposes of prostitution’ should be upheld, as they felt it served its purposes of combating street nuisance and harm to communities, in a way that outweighed other harms.
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Ok not gonna lie I’d let Chris Brown Beat the eff out of me”

by Melanie Hadida

I hate Rihanna. So much. Just ask any of my friends. If you’re ever out with me and we’re unlucky enough to have some background Rihanna music infiltrate our ears, I can guarantee you will have to sit through one of my anti-Rihanna rants.

Which is why I wasn’t surprised to wake up on Monday morning to see that more than one of my friends had brought this to my attention:

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/horrible-reactions-to-chris-brown-at-the-grammys

Was I shocked? Nope. Outraged? Obviously. Sad? Extremely.

As a proud feminist with an avid disdain for mainstream pop music, Rihanna was never really on my radar until this incident took place almost exactly 3 years ago:

http://gawker.com/5149353/chris-brown-arrested-for-allegedly-beating-up-rihanna

Chris Brown, another musical “artist” who I had never even thought twice about, was arrested for beating the shit out of his then girlfriend Rihanna. I believe they were either only about 20 or 21 at the time.

I have no interest in launching into a diatribe about violence against women, why it happens and how it affects women of every color, class and nationality. As we’ve seen with the recent Canadian Shafia murder trials, (highly profiled for its extreme heinousness but probably more for peoples’ fascination with the exotic and sexy term “honour killings” attached to the crimes) control and violence against women is still extremely prevalent in societies across the globe today.

In terms of Chris Brown’s ability to maintain popularity following his admission of brutality towards his then girlfriend, I was definitely not surprised. I mean, countless men strangely considered to be “role models” for youth (politicians, athletes, musicians etc.) behave in ways considered reprehensible by many yet their popularity (and their cash flow) never wanes.

So why is this incident so different?

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

On the Shafia Murder Trial…

by Elamin Abdelmahmoud

I don’t want to spend a lot of time on this matter, but I was stirred to comment (however briefly) about the Shafia murder trial.

(As a trigger warning, I briefly discuss rape and domestic abuse in this note).

I presume your basic knowledge of the case, as most mainstream media outlets spent a considerable time with it. It was, after all, a most horrific crime. Today, the verdict was handed down to the father, brother, and mother – all guilty, and all facing life in prison.

Before going on, I would like to reiterate the heinousness of the crime here.  I have no intention of arguing for the convicted members of the Shafia family, making excuses for them, or pardoning them of the crimes they have been accused, charged, and convicted of.

This piece was inspired purely by the discussion that the verdict has generated.  Specifically, the expression of outrage at ‘honour killings’ (the going term) and the lament for Canadian multiculturalism and how it has gone too far. I would like to suggest that, actually, by dubbing this an honour killing, we satisfy an elementary understanding of the crime while sidestepping the larger point.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers – And the Every Day Fight

by Sarah Allan

Today is International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers. This day of observance and action was created to call attention to crimes committed against sex workers all over the globe. While atrocities like the murders of dozens of survival sex workers from Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside (DTES) by Robert Pickton and the serial murders of sex workers in Seattle, Washington by the Green River Killer drew the attention of the popular media for their salacious details, many sex workers continue to routinely experience physical and sexual violence, as well as discrimination and marginalization. While women in general experience disproportionate amounts of violence in this world, and in Canada, for sex workers, their exposure to violence and their stigmatization is exasperated and their ability to protect themselves is hindered by the current legal framework and the ideologies espoused about sex work and women, in support of these laws.

Vancouver, 1984

http://blip.tv/first-coalition/sex-worker-rights-a-public-service-announcement-from-first-4153124

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,

National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women

by Sarah Allan

Today is the National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women.

If you have been so lucky as to have never experienced or witnessed violence against women in your own life, maybe some of the facts below will help you understand this pervasive problem. I hope they help to illustrate why more attention should be paid to the women who live affected by violence to give them options and offer them support, and continuous efforts be made to promote their safety and well-being, so we don’t have to remember them once it’s too late. Attention should also be made to the men in our lives, as more often than not it is those men close to women who perpetrate violence against them. We need to foster a culture of non-violence and respect for women, and raise the next generation of boys to be better than all those that came before them.
Remember, and then Act.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 76 other followers

%d bloggers like this: