Category Archives: Politics

Men and Feminism

by Emma Bonnemaison

Can men be feminists? Should men participate in the struggle to end sexism and sexual exploitation? How can men fit into the feminist women’s movement without co-opting it or replicating male dominance? Controversial, and often avoided, these questions are beginning to be asked more frequently by young profeminist men and feminists alike. Many profeminist men and feminist scholars have explained that feminism isn’t just for women, systems of patriarchy and gender expectations limit all of us just as gender equality benefits both men and women. Patriarchal thinking shapes core values and ways of being within our society. We are socialized into this system and under it both men and women suffer the consequences. This is not to say that men are not responsible for their actions or that they don’t benefit from patriarchy, however, many feminists argue that men who actively oppose systems of patriarchy have an integral part to play within the feminist movement. Others argue, because females are the oppressed group only women can empower other women. hooks defines feminism as a “movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation and oppression.”[1] Without absolving individual men of the responsibility to critically examine their privilege and take responsibility for their actions, defining feminism as an anti-sexist movement allows everybody to participate within feminist endeavors. Further, isn’t it time that men take responsibility to end their collusion with patriarchal oppression?

This article seeks to answer three questions contributed by Keir, a male colleague and close friend, who is interested in learning more about feminism and becoming a part of the movement. His direct participation and voice within this article contribute both literally and symbolically to a pro-feminist dialogue in hopes that creating these linkages between men and feminism will help to strengthen men’s understanding and connection to the movement.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The involvement of youth is essential for the survival of environmental science in Canada

by Kate Patterson

With the budding of a new school year, university students across the country are eagerly starting out on the next chapter of their lives in pursuit of their passions, but for many in biological and environmental science, that future may be quite bleak.  As science students, we are taught about the importance of collecting good data, which is only way to provide evidence to support a hypothesis, but that foundation is being systematically eroded from the political policy- making processes in Canada.

Over the last few months, the Harper government has drastically threatened the ability of scientists nationwide to conduct important biological and environmental research.  Let’s first start with the Omnibus Budget Bill that purged the Environmental Assessment Act and the Fisheries Act.  The Bill came into law in June and contained provisions in the Environmental Assessment Act that drastically reduced the number and scope of projects that will require evaluation before approval.  The protection of habitat was removed from the Fisheries Act, designating protection of areas only containing economically or culturally important species, thus eliminating most of the regulations that would prevent private development of sensitive aquatic areas.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Indiana Jones and Plight of the Musqueam People

by Chelsey Geralda Denise Armstrong

Sometimes archaeological finds do not “belong in a museum!” and nowhere is this more true than at the Musqueam village of c’əsnaʔəm (otherwise known as the Marpole Midden). A few weeks ago in Vancouver, some 300 band members and supporters came out for a peaceful protest against the condo development on c’əsnaʔəm blocking the Arthur Laing Bridge for a few hours.

Photo Credit – Georgia Straight July 2012

It’s funny, I don’t remember Indy’s digs being halted because he was ripping up burials for a residential expansion on the ancestral lands of a traditionally marginalized people. Unfortunately that is the state of archaeology in Canada today. You see, every province is in charge of managing their own ‘heritage’, ‘tourism’, ‘sport’ and other closely related domains. All provinces and territories have some form of legislation that says: “Before you develop here (condos, malls, houses) you have to do some kind of heritage/archaeological assessment” (kind of like an environmental assessment but more ambiguous and less restrictive).

So when the City of Vancouver and Province of British Columbia offered up part of the village of c’əsnaʔəm to developers, Archaeological Resource Management companies (many of them branches of various engineering firms) bid for the golden ticket – the chance to dig c’əsnaʔəm.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Thinking about Grandparent’s Raising Grandchildren this ‘Grandparents’ Day’

by Sarah Allan

Grandparents’ Day is a day to appreciate, recognize and celebrate every grandparent everywhere in the world. Grandparents who share time, wisdom, energy and love with grandchildren and great grandchildren; who provide child care while their children work; who spend their savings making sure their grandchildren have “a better life”; who don’t see their grandchildren and miss them dearly; and those who are raising their grandchildren 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, month after month, year after year.

In Canada, more than 65,000 children are being raised by a grandparent or other relative without any parental involvement. In British Columbia, there are almost 10,000 children who are being raised by their grandparents. This is more children than are in foster care in BC. Many of these children end up being cared for by their grandparents as the result of a crisis situation involving the child’s parents, such as the involvement of the Ministry of Children and Family Development, neglect or abandonment, drug addiction, mental health issues, incarceration or death. These amazing ‘grandparents raising grandchildren’, or ‘GRG’s’, have been referred to as the province’s ‘invisible foster care system’ as without them, the taxpayer funded foster care system would be responsible for the care and well-being of all of these children.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Rationale Behind the Invasion of Afghanistan is Not Control of Oil and Gas

By Jahanzeb Hussain

The invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 is perhaps the only American military venture whose cause and purpose is the most misunderstood. Why did the US attack Afghanistan? Is it because of Central Asian energy resources that the US wants to control? Did the US want to install itself right in the heart of Central Asia in order to dictate whatever economic and political development that can potentially take place in that region? After all, that region has the world’s last proven source of conventional gas and oil reserves – it is a powerhouse whose potential has yet to be properly exploited. It is also a region over which Russia, Iran, Turkey, China and India vie for influence. The only country missing in this Great Game is the United States, which, as an empire, cannot allow an important region such as Central Asia to be run by other countries, whether they are rivals or not. Following this logic, many conclude that Afghanistan was invaded to this end – for America to posit itself in a country which is the center of that region’s development (Afghanistan connects South Asia, Central Asia, Russia, China, Iran and Turkey together), as well as to surround Iran even further, and to install military bases on the Western/Southern front of China. In general, the invasion of Afghanistan was seen as a natural extension of America’s desire to militarize its energy politics in Muslim countries. The invasion of Iraq two years later was another proof of this policy. Afghanistan had all the credentials to qualify as yet another country that was targeted by the US for its geostrategic and economic importance.  Many would argue that attacks on the World Trade Center were welcomed by the United States as they helped provide a pretext for Washington to occupy Afghanistan and to continue its quest for global dominance.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , ,

Shady Sponsorship and Bhopal’s Special Olympics

by Melanie Hadida

Photo Credit: Sanjay Verma

About a week ago I found myself in Cardiff, Wales searching for a place to have a tea and scam some free internet so I could do some work. The best option to meet those specifications (in the city centre of a big UK city) is always Starbucks. It was a rare beautiful and sunny day and I was desperate to get as much time outdoors as possible. When I went up to the counter to order my chai, I asked the barista why their neatly stacked patio furniture had not been placed outside yet. “We’re not allowed,” she told me, “this is the Olympic Park area and no one is allowed to set up outdoors—we could be fined £20,000.” (On account of not giving a crap about the Olympics, I had no idea that Cardiff is apparently one of the event locations.)

Turns out, that since Starbucks isn’t an official sponsor of the 2012 London Olympic games, they could not set up tables and chairs on the lovely sunny cobblestone walkway outside of the café because this would be un-sanctioned advertisement for Starbucks. And this would make Coca Cola and McDonalds angry….and you wouldn’t like them when they’re angry…

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Anti-NATO Rally and the Peace and Reconciliation Ceremony in Chicago

by Jahanzeb Hussain

On May 20th and 21st, Chicago hosted the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for its summit on the future of Afghanistan. Absent from the official proceedings of course were the popular, dissenting Afghan and American voices. As usual, such voices were to be found in the city streets, as thousands of people marched in protest against the war, the summit and NATO.

This particular march though was not a regular demonstration against an American war. For the march was led by three young women – all of them in their 20s – from yet another country that is supposedly being liberated by the United States. For the march concluded with a reconciliation ceremony: Veteran US soldiers from both the Iraq and Afghan wars, after pronouncing their words of regret and apology, lanced their war medals onto the streets. In the eyes of these men and women, the medals were a sign of shame rather than a symbol of bravery; therefore, the appropriate manner to dispose them was to throw them away with all their emotional and physical strength. Then, the war veterans kneeled down in front of the three women to say sorry for what the United State has done to their people and their native country. At least, as far as the opposition to the Afghan war is concerned, which is the longest war in American history; there is no parallel example of humility and courage to be found.

The three women – Suraia Sahar, Saba Maher and Samira Rahman – belong to Afghans For Peace. They were invited by Iraq Veterans Against War to take part, help organize and lead the march, to give their speeches at the rally, and to be present at the justice and reconciliation ceremony. The march and the ceremony were significant in two respects: First, it makes a complete mockery of the image that the West presents of Muslim and Afghan women. Secondly, although not secondary in its importance, it was a moment of testimony by a number of former American soldiers that the war is a lie and that they are not the liberators of Afghan people but, in fact, they are – or were – their oppressors. Equally, the entire process – from the march to the ceremony – underlined the importance of the need for Americans to follow the lead of Afghans, especially Afghan women, as Afghan and American public confront the occupation of Afghanistan. Afghans have got everything to teach to the Americans concerning the war, resistance and the struggle for liberation. This is one critical dimension which often lacks in solidarity and anti-war movements. Gladly, however, nothing of this sort was missing on the day.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Open Letter from Chomsky, Shiva, Pilger, Santos, and 40 more..

Monday, July 23, 2012

The following self explanatory communication is being sent to many people and institutions.
Hello,

We the signers of the open letter from Noam Chomsky, Vandana Shiva, Boaventura de sousa Santos, John Pilger, and 40 other members of the interim decision body of the new International Organization for a Participatory Society, hope that you will republish our letter, and, even more, that you will publish commentary regarding the organization’s purpose, implications, prospects, etc.

Please reply to let us know your personal reaction, and whether you will be recirculating this, or perhaps taking some other related steps.

An Open Message to All Who Seek A New and Better World
We are members of what is called the the Interim Consultative Committee of the International Organization for a Participatory Society - or IOPS for short.

IOPS is actually an interim entity, pending a future founding convention. IOPS was convened just a few months ago and already has over 2,100 members from 85 countries and a ten language site, despite that it is barely known publicly. IOPS is currently building local chapters, which will unite to form national branches that in turn will compose an international organization.

We send this open letter to invite you to please visit the IOPS Site to examine its initial features – including especially and most importantly its Mission and Visionary and Programmatic Commitments.

The IOPS commitments emerged from a long process of discussion and debate. We believe they correspond closely to the most prevalent, advanced, and widely accessible political beliefs on which to build an organization for winning a better world.

We also hope and even believe that if you read and consider the IOPS commitments, you will likely find that they are congenial to your interests and desires and that they provide reason for great hope that IOPS can become a very important organization in the coming years.

If we had to summarize the IOPS commitments, we would note that they emphasize:

  • that IOPS focuses on cultural, kinship, political, economic, international, and ecological aims without a priori prioritizing any of these over the rest;
  • that IOPS advocates and elaborates key aspects of vision for a sustainable and peaceful world without sexism, heterosexism, racism, classism, and authoritarianism and with equity, justice, solidarity, diversity, and, in particular, self-management for all people
  • and that IOPS structurally and programmatically emphasizes planting the seeds of the future in the present, winning immediate gains on behalf of suffering constituencies in ways contributing to winning its long term aims as well, developing a caring and nurturing organization and movement, and welcoming and even fostering constructive dissent and diversity within that organization and movement and based on its commitments.

We think hundreds of thousands of people, in fact, millions of people, will, on reading the commitments, overwhelmingly agree with them. We hope that if you look at the commitments and feel that way, you will join and advocate that others join as well. If you instead have problems with the IOPS commitments, we hope you will make your concerns known so a productive discussion can ensue.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

THE WORLD WITHOUT THE INTERNET – AN INFOGRAPHIC

by Tony Shin@ohtinytony

Share this infographic!

Embed on your site:

<a href=”http://www.onlineeducation.net/world-without-internet”><img src=”http://images.onlineeducation.net.s3.amazonaws.com/world-without-internet.gif&#8221; alt=”World without Internet” width=”500″  border=”0″ /></a><br />Via: <a href=”http://www.onlineeducation.net/”>OnlineEducation.net</a&gt;

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers

%d bloggers like this: