Category Archives: Occupation

GAZA: How did we get to this point, anyway?

by A concerned citizen of the world,

There is no shortage of strong opinion on the situation in Israel/Palestine right now. We seem trapped between the rock of Israel’s collective punishment and the hard place of Palestinian rocket attacks. Any debate on the issue turns into a bunch of finger pointing and tiresome ‘whataboutery’. I think if we are going to construct a useful narrative about the state of the conflict, we need to take a step back from the current tit-for-tat escalations and look at how the situation has ended up as it is. The state of affairs today was actually set in motion years ago.

To understand the current context is to acknowledge that Israel has knowingly constructed the contours of the situation to eliminate the possibility of a viable peace process. They have intentionally realigned the narrative to underscore the idea that the conflict with the Palestinians is a zero-sum game, and that Israel is under attack from extremists who cannot be negotiated with.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,

Protesting Stephen Harpers’ Vancouver Visit

By Marius Stoner

It was shortly after twelve and a brisk summer’s day when I arrived at the Pan Pacific Hotel where Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper was scheduled to speak in a couple of hours. Already there were about a dozen people with signs and placards among the small crowd of mostly tourists that filled the circular, tree shaded benches along the road and a few people sat down in the area just in front of the doors to the Vancouver Convention Centre, the complex that housed the Pan Pacific.

Some video cameras on tripods were also apparent as other news organizations prepared to cover the event. At either side of the main doors were a pair of uniformed Vancouver Police officers in relflective vests. One of these pairs began to openly and actively photograph and videotape people as the crowd began to grow.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Rationale Behind the Invasion of Afghanistan is Not Control of Oil and Gas

By Jahanzeb Hussain

The invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 is perhaps the only American military venture whose cause and purpose is the most misunderstood. Why did the US attack Afghanistan? Is it because of Central Asian energy resources that the US wants to control? Did the US want to install itself right in the heart of Central Asia in order to dictate whatever economic and political development that can potentially take place in that region? After all, that region has the world’s last proven source of conventional gas and oil reserves – it is a powerhouse whose potential has yet to be properly exploited. It is also a region over which Russia, Iran, Turkey, China and India vie for influence. The only country missing in this Great Game is the United States, which, as an empire, cannot allow an important region such as Central Asia to be run by other countries, whether they are rivals or not. Following this logic, many conclude that Afghanistan was invaded to this end – for America to posit itself in a country which is the center of that region’s development (Afghanistan connects South Asia, Central Asia, Russia, China, Iran and Turkey together), as well as to surround Iran even further, and to install military bases on the Western/Southern front of China. In general, the invasion of Afghanistan was seen as a natural extension of America’s desire to militarize its energy politics in Muslim countries. The invasion of Iraq two years later was another proof of this policy. Afghanistan had all the credentials to qualify as yet another country that was targeted by the US for its geostrategic and economic importance.  Many would argue that attacks on the World Trade Center were welcomed by the United States as they helped provide a pretext for Washington to occupy Afghanistan and to continue its quest for global dominance.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , ,

The Anti-NATO Rally and the Peace and Reconciliation Ceremony in Chicago

by Jahanzeb Hussain

On May 20th and 21st, Chicago hosted the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for its summit on the future of Afghanistan. Absent from the official proceedings of course were the popular, dissenting Afghan and American voices. As usual, such voices were to be found in the city streets, as thousands of people marched in protest against the war, the summit and NATO.

This particular march though was not a regular demonstration against an American war. For the march was led by three young women – all of them in their 20s – from yet another country that is supposedly being liberated by the United States. For the march concluded with a reconciliation ceremony: Veteran US soldiers from both the Iraq and Afghan wars, after pronouncing their words of regret and apology, lanced their war medals onto the streets. In the eyes of these men and women, the medals were a sign of shame rather than a symbol of bravery; therefore, the appropriate manner to dispose them was to throw them away with all their emotional and physical strength. Then, the war veterans kneeled down in front of the three women to say sorry for what the United State has done to their people and their native country. At least, as far as the opposition to the Afghan war is concerned, which is the longest war in American history; there is no parallel example of humility and courage to be found.

The three women – Suraia Sahar, Saba Maher and Samira Rahman – belong to Afghans For Peace. They were invited by Iraq Veterans Against War to take part, help organize and lead the march, to give their speeches at the rally, and to be present at the justice and reconciliation ceremony. The march and the ceremony were significant in two respects: First, it makes a complete mockery of the image that the West presents of Muslim and Afghan women. Secondly, although not secondary in its importance, it was a moment of testimony by a number of former American soldiers that the war is a lie and that they are not the liberators of Afghan people but, in fact, they are – or were – their oppressors. Equally, the entire process – from the march to the ceremony – underlined the importance of the need for Americans to follow the lead of Afghans, especially Afghan women, as Afghan and American public confront the occupation of Afghanistan. Afghans have got everything to teach to the Americans concerning the war, resistance and the struggle for liberation. This is one critical dimension which often lacks in solidarity and anti-war movements. Gladly, however, nothing of this sort was missing on the day.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Re-thinking the Kony 2012 Video and Invisible Children Campaign

by Jahanzeb Hussain

There are plenty of things wrong with the very naive Kony 2012 Campaign. It re-enforces all the stereotypes: rich, mostly white folks from western countries going off to help little black kids in Africa. The people who made the film might have perfectly honest intentions, but the way they did it shows their narrow understanding of the world, as well as their lack of understanding of their own role in the world and in conflicts such as these. It also portrays the US as some force of good yet, the US supports and has supported criminals who are just as bad, and American companies support militias in the Congo in order to extract a mineral called Colton, which is used in cellphones.

These militias run slave and sex camps (Congo is the worst place in the world for women) but has anyone made a video on that? If you ask the same guys who made the Kony video, they would not even believe for a second that the US supports these atrocities in Congo. The video briefly mentioned that the US only intervenes in countries where its national interests are at stake; well, Congo is one of these countries, and the US intervenes in Congo, mainly supporting some of the worst acts of criminality in the world. Afghanistan is another country – from the point of view of children’s rights and women’s rights – where the US supported the worst of warlords and Taliban factions, even though they raped young boys and made the country a living hell for women. Obviously, nobody talks about the US role over here, simple because it doesn’t fall in the framework of American benevolence. If you want to know more about how the US media reports different war crimes and genocides depending on the US political involvement in a given country, I urge you to read Manufacturing Consent by Noam Chomsky, and the Politics of Genocide by Ed Herman.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Haiti: Aid that Respects Sovereignty, Not Foreign Occupation

by Tracy Giesz-Ramsay

Having had the opportunity to attend respected journalist and film-maker Kim Ives’ speaking event during his tour for Haiti Liberté, it has become even more clear that the progress of this small country – said to be the poorest in the Western Hemisphere – continues to be undermined by relentless foreign interference. The blame for the mass poverty, cholera epidemic, unlivable infrastructure and deep political corruption Haiti faces, lies without a doubt in the power Washington and Ottawa have over this resource rich portion of the island.

According to the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) nearly all of the ‘aid’ given to Haiti goes to ‘policing and prison’ systems. As well, for years the UN has led a campaign to convince its council that this is a country who literally can not police or govern itself and therefore needs member countries to invest in a ‘peacekeeping’ mission: MINUSTAH, the United Nations Stabilisation Mission In Haiti, which is blatantly just an occupying military force. This is absurd for a country the US has never gone to war with, or could even pretend to say presents a threat to anyone.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,

The Return of Occupy: Attaining True Democracy

By Natasza Zurek and Tracy Giesz-Ramsay

The Occupy movement is set to come back in full swing this Spring as suggested by renowned and respected Canadian figureheads: author Naomi Klein, humanitarian Romeo Dallaire and environmentalist David Suzuki, among others. And it should, because we still need change. Rather than being a beast of specific demands for the higher-ups, Occupy has become a model for a new way of attaining real democracy – where we don’t look for the solutions to come from individuals in places of concentrated power, but where the majority decides on the answers to the problems of our communities and throughout the world. What is sought is ‘participatory’ democracy: democracy of a kind we’ve never experienced before where the people themselves have a hand in policy making and a say in where the resources of this great continent should be used. If we’re able to bring back that light and make it burn brighter and longer, maybe we truly can create change. It’s possible that there will be a real revolution in the West and yes, we should most definitely come back and join the fight for it.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Military Adventurism is No Path to Peace

by Tracy Giesz-Ramsay

With power as the obvious incentive, we’ve seen a horrendous amount of military adventurism in Afghanistan – a country of strategic location, exploitable resources and an increasingly fragile society. From the Soviet invasion of the 1980’s to the US occupation in the early 2000’s, followed quickly by Canada and NATO today, history proves these desperate attempts at a grab for control by belligerent, hegemonic countries has never done a thing to bring the lofty goal of so-called ‘stability’ to the land or it’s population.

If you take a country where, for much of it’s history, every ounce of it’s soul has been committed to the relentless battle of trying to fight out a foreign imperialist presence, well, it seems too obvious that it’s politics are going to be corrupt, it’s cities are crumbling, it’s women and children face massive neglect or abuse and it’s main export is an illegal substance. When you create a warzone and continue for years to solidify a military presence rather than let a society implement the structures required for peace, you instill within minds that the only way to address a problem is by force, violence and corruption.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , ,

Inclusion not Exclusion: The Best Form of Activism

by Ludde Maclean

Political and Social Justice activism is an important democratic duty we must never cast aside no matter what type of scrutiny is faced. We all know there is a division between protestors and non-protestors: those who physically take a stand, and those who think you must either ‘get into the system’ or simply vote if you want to change society, (and who therefore view protests, whether peaceful or forceful, as a nuisance.) This is an age old divide that is closely aligned with classism and right vs. left wing philosophies. It is something that one would think would unite everyone who is on the same ‘side’: the ones for democratic protest vs. those against it. But if you take a closer look, nothing is black and white.

It’s clear that those who engage in activism are also sometimes divided amongst themselves. Some are adamant that, for many of the world’s problems that have been ignored for years by the higher-ups, force is necessary to bring about change. That anger is the only way forward and the only way to start getting people in positions of power to realize the real threat of the majority who their policies affect. And this is not hard to understand. I’m sure everyone who has seen any documentary about the concentration of wealth, power and control of the media (and therefore much of public opinion) begins to feel the heat of rage overcome them. You begin to want to scream ‘Do something!’ to your peers as well as the officials at fault. This method of activism is surely effective in bringing attention to issues that matter, but the question comes when you start to look at the effectiveness of the way we carry out our message. How will people – from those in the streets to those in office towers – respond in an open and supportive manner? Is anger and sometimes the exclusion that come with this anger the best way to be heard and promote change? Does it turn people off and make them want to ignore your issue? Well yes, sometimes it does.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,

‘Ghetto Palestine’ on People’s Health Radio

by Melanie Spence

December 8th on People’s Health Radio we bring you a lecture on “Ghetto Palestine” delivered by Canadian writer and photojournalist Jon Elmer at UBC on December 2, 2011. Jon’s perspective is based on 10 years of reporting from the West Bank and Gaza. His on-the-ground experience of events such as the second intifada and the Fatah-Hamas clashes in Gaza inform an analysis absent from mainstream media narratives.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers

%d bloggers like this: