Category Archives: Civil LIberties

Aaron Swartz and the Fight for Freedom of Information

by Tracy Giesz-Ramsay

I had the brief chance to meet Aaron Swartz two years ago while in New York, and was instantly drawn to his charismatic outspokenness and passion when talking about the freedom of the internet and it’s powerful capability to inspire revolution and organize youth activism around the world. The room was full of fellow advocates and friends who when Aaron spoke, listened with awe and intensity to his every word. It was a swift encounter but a truly inspiring one. The following is a collection of statements from his close friends, family, and acquaintances that I find summarize the tragic situation far better than I could hope to myself:

AaronSwartz

“Since his arresting the early morning of January 11, 2011 — two years to the day before Aaron Swartz ended his life — I have known more about the events that began this spiral than I have wanted to know. Aaron consulted me as a friend and lawyer that morning. He shared with me what went down and why, and I worked with him to get help. When my obligations to Harvard created a conflict that made it impossible for me to continue as a lawyer, I continued as a friend. Not a good enough friend, no doubt, but nothing was going to draw that friendship into doubt.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Case of the Cuban Five

by the International Committee for the Freedom of the Cuban Five

A LEGAL UPDATE: THE CASE OF THE CUBAN FIVE

In September 1998, five Cuban men were arrested in Miami by FBI agents. Gerardo Hernandez, Ramón Labañino, Fernando Gonzalez, Antonio Guerrero and René Gonzalez were accused of the crime of conspiracy to commit espionage. The US government never accused them of actual espionage, nor did it affirm that real acts of espionage had been carried out, as no classified document had been confiscated from the Five. Their actual mission in the United States was monitoring the activities of the groups and organizations responsible for terrorist activities against Cuba. After the triumph of the Cuban revolution in 1959, Cuba had been the victim of more terrorist attacks than any other country in the world, killing 3,478 and injuring 2,099. The vastly majority of those attacks originated in southern Florida, by groups tolerated and partly financed by the US government.

After their arrest, the Five were immediately placed in solitary confinement, isolated from all other inmates for the entire 17 months of pretrial custody. For the first five months they were housed in separate cells isolated from each other as well as the other inmates. After those five months, a motion was filed by the defense asserting that their need to work on their defense was being compromised by the isolation. Four were then moved into the same single cell, with one kept housed alone, but they remained in the Special Housing Unit in isolation cells for all 17 months before their case was first brought before a court.

In spite of the vigorous objections raised by the Five’s defense, the case was tried in Miami, Florida, a community with a long history of hostility toward the Cuban government, which prevented them from receiving a fair trial.

Cuban 5

The trial, which lasted over six months, became the longest trial in United States history. More than 119 volumes of testimony and over 20,000 pages of documents were compiled, including the testimony of three retired US Army generals and a retired admiral, who agreed that no evidence of espionage existed.

Near the trial’s conclusion, when the case was about to be handed to the jury for consideration, the US government recognized in writing that it had failed to prove the main charge against Gerardo Hernandez, conspiracy to commit murder, admitting that it was facing an “insurmountable obstacle” in connection with winning the case. This charge had been added seven months after Gerardo’s arrest. However, the jury, under intense pressure brought to bear on them by the local media and Cuban-American community, nonetheless found the Five guilty of all charges.

The Five were sentenced to a total of four life sentences plus 77 years and were imprisoned in five separate maximum security prisons spread across the US without the possibility of communication with each other.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Protesting Stephen Harpers’ Vancouver Visit

By Marius Stoner

It was shortly after twelve and a brisk summer’s day when I arrived at the Pan Pacific Hotel where Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper was scheduled to speak in a couple of hours. Already there were about a dozen people with signs and placards among the small crowd of mostly tourists that filled the circular, tree shaded benches along the road and a few people sat down in the area just in front of the doors to the Vancouver Convention Centre, the complex that housed the Pan Pacific.

Some video cameras on tripods were also apparent as other news organizations prepared to cover the event. At either side of the main doors were a pair of uniformed Vancouver Police officers in relflective vests. One of these pairs began to openly and actively photograph and videotape people as the crowd began to grow.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Open Letter from Chomsky, Shiva, Pilger, Santos, and 40 more..

Monday, July 23, 2012

The following self explanatory communication is being sent to many people and institutions.
Hello,

We the signers of the open letter from Noam Chomsky, Vandana Shiva, Boaventura de sousa Santos, John Pilger, and 40 other members of the interim decision body of the new International Organization for a Participatory Society, hope that you will republish our letter, and, even more, that you will publish commentary regarding the organization’s purpose, implications, prospects, etc.

Please reply to let us know your personal reaction, and whether you will be recirculating this, or perhaps taking some other related steps.

An Open Message to All Who Seek A New and Better World
We are members of what is called the the Interim Consultative Committee of the International Organization for a Participatory Society - or IOPS for short.

IOPS is actually an interim entity, pending a future founding convention. IOPS was convened just a few months ago and already has over 2,100 members from 85 countries and a ten language site, despite that it is barely known publicly. IOPS is currently building local chapters, which will unite to form national branches that in turn will compose an international organization.

We send this open letter to invite you to please visit the IOPS Site to examine its initial features – including especially and most importantly its Mission and Visionary and Programmatic Commitments.

The IOPS commitments emerged from a long process of discussion and debate. We believe they correspond closely to the most prevalent, advanced, and widely accessible political beliefs on which to build an organization for winning a better world.

We also hope and even believe that if you read and consider the IOPS commitments, you will likely find that they are congenial to your interests and desires and that they provide reason for great hope that IOPS can become a very important organization in the coming years.

If we had to summarize the IOPS commitments, we would note that they emphasize:

  • that IOPS focuses on cultural, kinship, political, economic, international, and ecological aims without a priori prioritizing any of these over the rest;
  • that IOPS advocates and elaborates key aspects of vision for a sustainable and peaceful world without sexism, heterosexism, racism, classism, and authoritarianism and with equity, justice, solidarity, diversity, and, in particular, self-management for all people
  • and that IOPS structurally and programmatically emphasizes planting the seeds of the future in the present, winning immediate gains on behalf of suffering constituencies in ways contributing to winning its long term aims as well, developing a caring and nurturing organization and movement, and welcoming and even fostering constructive dissent and diversity within that organization and movement and based on its commitments.

We think hundreds of thousands of people, in fact, millions of people, will, on reading the commitments, overwhelmingly agree with them. We hope that if you look at the commitments and feel that way, you will join and advocate that others join as well. If you instead have problems with the IOPS commitments, we hope you will make your concerns known so a productive discussion can ensue.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why Are You Really Watching ‘Tammy Takes On 10′?

by Tegan MacDonald

PORNOGRAPHY. I imagine we have all come across porn on some level or another; videos, magazines, animation, photos, et cetera. So let me ask you this, for those who view porn, are you watching ‘sex-positive’ porn or are you settling for easily accessible ‘sex-negative’ porn? If you’re watching the latter, ask yourself this: Why is it that you choose to do so?

Sex-positive porn (SPP) can be loosely described as: consensual, non-objectifying, non-exploitative and enjoyable for all participants. Whereas sex-negative porn (SNP) can be loosely described as: non-consensual, abusive, demeaning and harmful (or at least appearing to be so). Whatever the reason or reasons are that you might occasionally go to the porn shop, or systematically visit your ‘favourites’ to stream the latest ‘Jizzed On Jasmine, Featuring 1 Female and 5 Males’, ask yourself if this content is something that you want to be exposed to. Take a minute or two to think about your motivations before you choose between ‘Amateur Anal Bust Andy’ or ‘Cock-smacked Candy’…

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , ,

La Hausse La Hausse… On the 100th Day of Student Protests in Quebec

by Annie Guglia

Je m’appelle Annie Guglia, j’ai 21 ans, je suis candidate au Baccalauréat en Administration des Affaire à l’Université du Québec À Montréal, et contrairement à ce que les médias essaient de vous faire croire, je ne suis pas ni terroriste, ni extrémiste, ni anticapitaliste, et j’arrive absolument à comprendre les répercussions directes et indirectes de mes actions.

Je sais que beaucoup de canadiens hors-Québec pensent que les étudiants québécois sont idiots et agissent en bébés gâtés depuis l’annonce de la hausse de nos frais de scolarité postsecondaires. Nous payons effectivement les droits de scolarité les moins cher en Amérique du Nord, nous en sommes conscients. Cependant, toute problématique doit être placée dans son contexte afin d’être comprise, et je trouve que la plupart des médias (et surtout anglais) exposent mal le conflit étudiant que je côtoie presque quotidiennement. Laissez-moi donc vous expliquer objectivement (ou presque) en quoi consiste la hausse imposée par le gouvernement libéral de Jean Charest, et ensuite, je placerai cette hausse dans son contexte socio-politico-économique afin d’expliquer pourquoi elle est inacceptable aux yeux de beaucoup de Québécois. 

My name is Annie Guglia. I am 21 years old, and I study management at Université du Québec à Montréal. Unlike the media is trying to convey, I am not a terrorist or extremist or anticapitalist, and I fully understand the direct and indirect consequences of my actions. I know some of you “off-Quebec” support us, and I thank you! Some others think that Quebec students are currently acting like idiots or spoiled children since our government announced a drastic tuition fee hike. We acknowledge that we pay a lot less that most people in North America, but everything in life must be put in its context to be understood. Let me explain first objectively (but not really) what the increase will be, then I will put it in its socio-politico-economic context to make you understand the reasons why the increase is so unacceptable to most Quebecers at this point.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Paul Hawken on Ideology, Abolitionists, and a New Movement for our Future

by Tracy Giesz-Ramsay

Given the opportunity to hear environmentalist and author Paul Hawken speak, one would be hard pressed to leave without feeling equally hopeful and inspired about the future of humanity. Hawken is the author of “Blessed Unrest, How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming” and although a gentle speaker, his words vivaciously seize your attention and don’t let it go as he takes you on a phonetic tour through the histories of true grassroots movements, starting from the abolitionists in the 1700’s leading up to today’s smaller-scale, non-governmental organizations that are working for environmental and social justice. Hawken is the founder of wiserearth.org, a database of these NGOs that aims to present a platform of necessary issues that they collectively agree must be addressed in order to sustain and save our planet.

For Hawken, this historical journey and subsequent documentation began on his first book tour when people from non-profits kept handing him their organization’s business cards. Never getting rid of them, he found himself one day with literally thousands from all types of environmental and social justice organizations around the world. This led him to the realization that the social justice and human rights movements were really just different expressions of one movement that included the environmental movement.

He found there are currently around 2 million organizations with 100-200 million people working every single day towards preserving, and restoring some semblance of grace and justice to this world with what they do in their daily activity, affecting billions of people. As he states, it’s a massive network composed of: students, peasant workers, tribal villagers, doctors, engineers, mediators, peace makers, mothers, activists, immigrants, children, refugees, tree planters, poets, farmers, biologists, Muslims, Christians and Buddhists. It includes every culture, every tribe, and every language in the world today. And the notable thing is that this movement has no leader. We’re so accustomed to a movement or a revolution having a singular, often charismatic leader, and while there are certainly spokespeople all over the world, there is no defined leader.

What also distinguishes this movement from anything else that we’ve ever seen, is that it is not ideological. It is a movement of ideas and solutions; a movement of both trying to stop the harm and resist what’s going on by providing new ways of imagining this relationship between the two most complex systems there are, which are human culture and the earth’s living ecosystems.

Hawkens states that if you look back at the 19th century, you’ll see the birth of ideologies and isms. And then taking a look at the 20th century, you’ll see total war of these ideologies; one hundred and twenty million people died while the advocates of each ideology battled one another trying to figure out who was right.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 101 – Happy 30th Birthday!

by Sarah Allan

If you’re like me, and were born after 1982, you never knew a Canada without the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Maybe that is why so many of us never really think about the Charter and what it means, because for us, it has always been there. So, since it seems that Harper and his Conservatives are too busy selling off our natural resources and making enemies of the popultion to celebrate this important milestone in Canadian history, and to avoid taking for granted the rights and protections this prolific document provides and guarantees us as Canadians, today, on the Charter’s 30th birthday, I thought I’d give you all a run down on the Charter and it’s main provisions. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 101!

Why are you allowed to share your opinions with others as you please? The Charter! Why do you have a right to vote? The Charter! Why do you have a right to a lawyer if you’re arrested? The Charter! Why are you presumed innocent until proven guilty? The Charter! Why is the government required to treat us equally regardless of race or gender? The Charter! As you read this, I hope that you will think about how the Charter impacts your life and the lives of other Canadians, but also, I hope you will try and imagine what life would be without it, because my friends Canada would be a very different place.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

MARCH 18: Community March Against Racism

by Fathima Cader

March 21, the International Day for the Elimination of Racism, marks the anniversary of the 1960 Sharpeville Massacre in South Africa, when police opened fire on hundreds of South Africans protesting against Apartheid’s passbook laws. Police killed 67 people and wounded 186.

This year, in light of the recent string of hate crimes committed by the white supremacist group ‘Blood and Honor’ on Commercial Drive in Vancouver, we encourage our families, friends, neighbours, and supporters to continue to counter racism. The violence perpetrated by ‘Blood and Honour’ members included unprovoked physical attacks on a Black man, a Latino man, and an Indigenous woman. The neo-Nazis, three of whom have been charged, also doused a Filipino man with gasoline and set him on fire as he napped on a bench on Commercial Drive. Last year, other members of this same group were charged in Edmonton for three hate crimes there. The group’s membership is active across Canada and the States.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 76 other followers

%d bloggers like this: